Alicia Dudeney vs Aurora Zantedeschi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Aurora Zantedeschi has shown better performance on second serve points recently, winning 41.48% compared to Alicia Dudeney's 35.87%. Could this give Aurora an edge in service games? It’s possible, as this stat correlates highly with match outcomes.
• In return games, Alicia Dudeney excels by winning 52.53% of points on opponents' second serves, slightly outdoing Aurora’s 48.95%. Does this suggest Alicia might dominate return games? The numbers say yes.
• Both players are almost identical in saving breakpoints, with Alicia saving 49.47% and Aurora saving 49.44%. Could this mean they both handle pressure similarly? Indeed, it appears so.
• Looking at overall match performance, Alicia has a higher win rate over the last year, achieving 72.73% compared to Aurora’s 53.33%. Does this indicate consistent superiority? Alicia's match record might suggest so.
• Aurora thrives on Clay with a career 58% win rate, whereas Alicia excels on Hard courts with the same 58% success. Which surface could sway the match? It depends on the ground, as both have their respective advantages.
• Despite performing mostly in the same tournament circuits, Alicia posts a better win percentage (60% vs. 50%) in recent competitive play, suggesting a possible edge in experience.
• When it comes to opponent quality, Alicia has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents on average, indicating a marginally tougher competition background.
• If this match extends to a deciding set, Aurora holds the advantage, having won 63% of such sets recently compared to Alicia’s 42%. Will this determine the outcome if it’s a tight contest? History leans towards Aurora.
• Aurora and Alicia exhibit similar breakpoint conversion rates, with Alicia having a slight edge at 41.80% compared to Aurora's 40.27%, potentially impacting crucial moments.

Editorial Prediction (November 19, 2025, UTC):

As Aurora Zantedeschi and Alicia Dudeney enter the upcoming match, the statistics paint a nuanced picture of their strengths and weaknesses. While Aurora displays better prowess on her second serve, Alicia's ability to win on return could counteract this advantage significantly.

Considering overall performance in the past year, Alicia's higher win percentage may signal greater consistency and resolve. However, Aurora's stronger performance in deciding sets suggests she could have the upper hand if the match turns into a tightly contested battle.

Alicia has faced slightly stronger opponents based on ranking, implying a possibly higher resilience under challenging circumstances. Yet, Aurora's proficiency on Clay might influence the outcome if the surface aligns with her strengths.

With these factors in mind, although Alicia appears to have an all-rounded statistical edge, Aurora's resilience and strategic advantages in deciding sets suggest that she might emerge victorious in this closely matched face-off.